This joint resolution disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to "Interpretation of the 'Advice' Exemption in Section 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act."
The joint resolution declares that such rule shall have no force or effect.
(Under section 203 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, an employer must report any agreement or arrangement with a third party consultant to persuade employees as to their collective bargaining rights or to obtain certain information concerning the activities of employees or a labor organization in connection with a labor dispute involving the employer. The consultant, also, is required to report concerning such an agreement or arrangement with an employer. Statutory exceptions to these reporting requirements are set forth in LMRDA section 203[c], which provides, in part, that employers and consultants are not required to file a report by reason of the consultant's giving or agreeing to give "advice" to the employer.)
| Action Date | Type | Text | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-09-12 | Calendars | Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 575. | House floor actions |
| 2016-09-12 | Committee | Reported by the Committee on Education and the Workforce. H. Rept. 114-739. | House floor actions |
| 2016-05-18 | Committee | Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 13. | House committee actions |
| 2016-05-18 | Committee | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held. | House committee actions |
| 2016-04-15 | IntroReferral | Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. | House floor actions |
| 2016-04-15 | IntroReferral | Introduced in House | Library of Congress |